Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

analyzed on

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "analyzed on" is not correct in standard written English.
It is typically used incorrectly; the correct preposition should be "analyzed in" or "analyzed for" depending on the context. Example: "The data was analyzed in detail to identify trends."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Samples were analyzed on Agilent HPLC.

Additional samples were analyzed on days 7 and/or 21.

A 3-μL sample was analyzed on GC-MS.

The data were analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis.

Peptide samples were analyzed on a Shimadzu LC-20A HPLC.

The strains were only analyzed on the glucose medium.

Sample fractions were analyzed on 12 % SDS-PAGE.

Purified protein samples are analyzed on native PAGE gels.

Narrow micropore distribution was analyzed on Micromeritics ASAP 2020.

Labeled cells were analyzed on the same day.

Inductively coupled plasma (ICP) analyzed on a Shimadzu ICPS-7000.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When describing how something was analyzed, consider using "analyzed in" or "analyzed using" for better grammatical correctness. For example, instead of "The data was analyzed on SPSS," use "The data was analyzed in SPSS" or "The data was analyzed using SPSS."

Common error

Avoid consistently using "analyzed on" in scientific papers. While common, it is often grammatically weak. Vary your phrasing with alternatives like "evaluated using," "examined within," or "assessed through" to enhance clarity and precision.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

81%

Authority and reliability

2.8/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "analyzed on" functions primarily as part of a passive construction, indicating that a subject has undergone analysis. While Ludwig shows numerous examples, it's important to note that it's often used incorrectly, according to Ludwig AI.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

90%

News & Media

5%

Formal & Business

3%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

1%

Wiki

0.5%

Reference

0.5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "analyzed on" is frequently used, particularly in scientific contexts, to indicate that a subject has been examined. However, according to Ludwig AI, its usage is often grammatically questionable. More precise alternatives such as "analyzed in" or "analyzed using" are often preferred to maintain clarity and correctness. While Ludwig provides examples across various domains, consider the grammatical implications when choosing this phrase.

FAQs

How can I use "analyzed in" correctly in a sentence?

Use "analyzed in" to specify the context or tool used for analysis. For example, "The samples were "analyzed in" a controlled environment" or "The data was "analyzed in" SPSS version 20".

What are some alternatives to "analyzed on"?

Depending on the context, you can use phrases like "analyzed using", "evaluated based on", or "examined through".

Is "analyzed on" grammatically correct?

While commonly used, "analyzed on" is often considered grammatically incorrect. It's preferable to use ""analyzed in"" or "analyzed using" for greater clarity and adherence to standard English.

How does the choice of preposition affect the meaning of "analyzed on"?

The choice of preposition can subtly change the meaning. "Analyzed in" specifies the environment or tool, while "analyzed using" emphasizes the method. Using "on" is generally less precise and can be vague.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

81%

Authority and reliability

2.8/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: