Specifically, the standard parameters for each analyzed method are listed in Additional file 2: Table S1.
The analyzed methods are robust to inaccurate alignment, face occlusions, and variations in expressions, to a large degree.
Compared to the effect of high-pass filtering, differences between the five analyzed methods were small, with extended Infomax performing best.
The analyzed methods are selected by considering their performance in former comparative studies, in addition to be real-time, to require just one image per person, and to be fully online.
The flow fluctuation model shows a good agreement with the experiments and the analyzing method is expected to other oscillating flow system.
While point target simulation is analyzed, the method is validated by E-SAR raw data.
Multiple pairwise comparisons between the analyzing methods were performed to examine whether significant differences occur using a paired t-test for the normally distributed data.
The principles of short test methods for impact sound insulation measurements are analyzed and a method is outlined.
So, to cover this deficiency and analyze carefully, DEA method is used to compare the findings of both methods mentioned.
