Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(4)
The gels were analyzed in pairs to minimize any mismatching of spots that was pertinent to complex match sets.
Datasets were analyzed in pairs, and the person responsible for segmenting each scan (AL) was blinded to the participants ID number and the timepoint of the scan.
The data sets were analyzed in pairs using CyberT (see Methods) for significant differences in transcript abundance: M + Tv compared to Tv, T + Tv compared to Tv, and M + Tv compared to T + Tv.
As mentioned, data of the case-crossover design were organized and analyzed in pairs (i.e., presence or absence of the situational factors in the last UAI and last PAI episodes) which were matched within the same individuals.
Similar(56)
As mentioned, these data were analyzed in paired data of the same individuals.
Expression levels of ETS2 and miR-196b were analyzed in paired adjacent normal and gastric tumor tissues from 63 patients.
This analysis suggests that T has masculinizing effects in the sexually dimorphic muscles; however, the magnitude of the variation in our samples limited the power to define differences when multiple properties were analyzed in pair-wise comparisons.
Obesity-related differentially expressed proteins (both MT and co-purified non-MT) were analyzed in pair-wise comparisons of non-fasted mice; the analysis was independent for each group of obese mice.
MicroRNA profiles were analyzed in three pairs of CCA tumor specimens and non-tumorous-paired biliary tissues using Agilent microRNA microarrays.
ARID4A expression was also analyzed in 24 pairs of tumor and matched normal tissues from laryngeal squamous cell carcinomas and in 23 pairs of tumor and matched normal tissues from oral tongue squamous cell carcinomas.
When DNA methylation was analyzed in 14 pairs of genetically unrelated individuals, amplicons showing methylation overlap were, on average 5.2-fold more frequent than amplicons showing opposite overlap (range 2.5-fold to 9.3-fold, with P values ranging from 10-7 to 10-66; Table 1).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com