Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
Overall, no differences were found when analyzed by test type of specimen collection, educational level, having performed an HIVST and type of approach.
Similar(59)
Potential buffering factors were analyzed by testing for effect modification.
Immune sera were analyzed by testing their reactivity against VP6 by ELISA) and Western blot).
The datasets were analyzed by tests for equal variance and normal distribution to help select the appropriate test.
Gene duplications in the apple genome were analyzed by testing the similarity of all MdHsf genes using ClustalW.
Differences were analyzed by t-test.
Data were analyzed by t-test for equality of means.
Differences between groups were analyzed by t-test.
All others analyzed by t-test.
Differences between two groups were analyzed by t-test.
Significative differences were analyzed by t-test (*P ≤ 0,05).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com