analyzed against

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "analyzed against" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when comparing data or information to a standard, benchmark, or set of criteria to evaluate its performance or validity. Example: "The results of the experiment were analyzed against the established control group to determine the effectiveness of the new drug."

✓ Grammatically correct

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

60 human-written examples

The Florida report analyzed 168,900 deaths statewide.

The New York Times

We analyzed 350,000 tweets across 300 companies.

Harvard Business Review

Y.G. performed and analyzed 4C experiments.

Nature

Mice were analyzed 30 days post injection.

Nature

Cells were analyzed 48 h post transfection.

Nature

We analyzed 247,316 pregnancies.

Preventive Medicine

We analyzed 26 patients.

Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology

Impath said it analyzed 220,000 cancer cases last year.

The New York Times

The society analyzed 49 mixtures offered by 15 companies.

The New York Times

The cells were analyzed 72 and 96 h post-transfection.

Nature

Proliferation was analyzed 3 days after T cell stimulation.

Nature

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "analyzed against", ensure clarity about the standard or criteria being used for comparison. Specify the benchmark to provide context and strengthen the analysis.

Common error

Avoid using "analyzed against" without clearly stating what the analysis is being compared to. Ambiguous reference points weaken the analysis and create uncertainty.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "analyzed against" functions as a verb phrase indicating a process of examination and comparison. Ludwig AI indicates that it's considered correct in written English. It suggests a systematic assessment where data or findings are scrutinized in relation to a specific standard or benchmark.

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "analyzed against" is a grammatically correct expression used to indicate a comparative evaluation. Although there are no instances of it in the provided search data, Ludwig confirms its validity. When using "analyzed against", it's important to clearly define the criteria or standards being employed in the analysis. Alternatives such as "compared with" or "evaluated against" may suit different contexts.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

compared with

Focuses on direct comparison, often highlighting similarities and differences.

evaluated against

Emphasizes judgment or assessment based on established criteria.

assessed in relation to

Highlights the connection and interdependence of the analyzed data and the reference point.

benchmarked against

Specifically uses a benchmark (standard of excellence) for evaluation.

checked against

Suggests a verification process, ensuring alignment with expectations.

measured against

Emphasizes quantifiable comparison using specific metrics.

weighed against

Implies a careful consideration of the relative importance or influence.

tested against

Highlights a rigorous examination to determine effectiveness or validity.

contrasted with

Focuses on highlighting the differences between the analyzed data and the reference.

verified with

Suggests confirming the accuracy or truthfulness of something using a reference.

FAQs

How can I use "analyzed against" in a sentence?

Use "analyzed against" when you want to express that data or information is being evaluated or compared to a specific standard, benchmark, or set of criteria. For example, "The experimental results were "compared with" the control group's data."

What's a good alternative to "analyzed against"?

Depending on the context, alternatives include "compared with", "evaluated against", or "assessed in relation to". The best choice depends on the specific nuances you want to convey.

Is there a difference between "analyzed against" and "compared to"?

While similar, "analyzed against" often implies a more formal or structured evaluation process than "compared to", which can be a more general comparison.

When is it appropriate to use "benchmarked against" instead of "analyzed against"?

"Benchmarked against" is best used when specifically referencing a benchmark, which is a recognized standard of excellence or best practice. "Analyzed against" is more general and can refer to any standard or "set of criteria".