However, in a properly analyzed proposition, there is a clear isomorphism between the structure of the proposition and the structure of the fact that would make it true (PLA, 197); hence a precise and analyzed proposition is capable of being true in one and only one way (Vag, 219).
It is clear to see in this case that a very specific state of things is required for the truth of the analyzed proposition, and hence the truth of it will be far more doubtful than the truth of the vague assertion with which one began the process (PLA, 179 80).
Furthermore, we applied this preliminary theoretical framework using an in-depth and longitudinal case-study of the amateur photo camera market in Germany to analyze the propositions for disruptive susceptibility on a past disruptive innovation for consistency.
This provides the means to go back and analyze all propositions into their atomic parts, since "every statement about complexes can be analyzed into a statement about their constituent parts, and into those propositions which completely describe the complexes" (TLP 2.0201).
In Dilemmas (1954) Ryle analyzes propositions that appear irreconcilable, as when free will is set in opposition to the fatalistic view that future specific events are inevitable.
To analyze this proposition we will analyze the literature on cognitive load and cognitive learning processes, and relate this to experiences from three case studies in which novices and experts were offered design patterns to develop and implement systems and processes.
We analyze this proposition by considering litigation-generated science as a subset of science involving conflict of interest.
When analyzed, such propositions as "O1 is located at p1 at t1" are revealed as having a much more complicated logical form, and hence may have logical consequences not evident before analysis.
This much neglected chapter is quite interesting because it is the only chapter where he analyzed particular propositions, making essential use of additional letters like "v" to encode "some".
The plaintiffs, the Campaign for Fiscal Equity, argued that new Regents standards do include the cognitive skills to analyze complex ballot propositions and weigh statistical and other technical evidence in jury trials.
