Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(21)
In our study we analyze (i) allometric biomass functions, (ii) biomass expansion factors in combination with volume functions and (iii) a combination of both.
The aim of this study was to analyze i) the monitoring and scores of the different activities of continuous assessment proposed in a mandatory course, ii) the type of questions that best evaluate and discriminate the learning process.
The purpose of this study was to identify and analyze: ((i)) software measurement related factors that positively influence SPC implementation, and (ii) software measurement related factors that negatively influence SPC implementation.
To understand the role of family innovations, I analyze (i) the dispersion in (xi ^{k}_{ft}) for each outcome and (ii) the correlations between the family innovation parameters for different outcomes.
This makes it possible to systematically analyze: (i) the "completeness" of a balancing circuit (the ability to address the imbalance between any two cells directly, even if they are not adjacent); (ii) the shortest path for balancing any two given cells; and (iii) the average efficiency of a balancing circuit for a statistical distribution of imbalance scenarios.
Complementary studies of 3-methylbutyne and 1-penten-4-yne hydrogenation were carried out in order to analyze (i) the impact of isomerization on the observed mono-olefin distribution in valylene/isoprene hydrogenation and (ii) the conjugation issue in partial ene-yne hydrogenation.
Similar(39)
However, this conclusion is restricted by the variability encountered for both asphalt groups analyzed (i.e., AR and PM).
Three strengthening mechanisms have been analyzed: (i) boundary strengthening, (ii) dislocation strengthening and (iii) solid solution hardening.
All available data were analyzed (i.e., all eyes receiving study product were analyzed).
The interrater reliability across all states analyzed (i.e., 50 states plus the District of Columbia) was 75%.
The results were similar in all three cohorts analyzed, i.e. 20.8, 18.6 and 19.0%.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com