Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(33)
The accuracy of the method was assessed by determining analytical recovery.
Accuracy of the proposed assay was assessed by analytical recovery studies.
The analytical recovery was calculated and found to be 97.3−101.5 ± 0.25−1.54%.
The analytical recovery for water samples spiked with As III) ranged between 98% and 106%.
Good analytical recovery of glucose spiked into serum samples, with recoveries in the range of 96.7 105.0%, was exhibited.
The mean analytical recovery was calculated using five determinations and was found to be 98.74 ± 0.7% to 100.22 ± 1.24% indicating the accuracy of the proposed assay.
Similar(27)
Quantitative Fe recoveries (higher than 98%) were observed within the 15 loading/elution cycles, and analytical recoveries lower than 98% were obtained after that (Table 7).
The mass transfer of these chemicals from 5 mL blood into 0.94 g PDMS was 62 84%, which is similar to analytical recoveries in conventional solvent extraction methods.
Moreover, incorporation of IL-nanomaterial hybrids in miniaturized solid phase and liquid phase microextraction procedures is being increasingly exploited to obtain high analytical recoveries while developing environmentally friendly analytical methods.
The limit of detection was 0.021 μg g−1 (referred to dried mass), the repeatability of the overall method was 4.7% (n = 9) and the analytical recoveries were between 98 and 105%.
The limits of quantification of the method were 11, 6.7, and 12 ng L−1, for inorganic mercury, methyl-mercury and ethyl-mercury, respectively (pre-concentration factor of 50); whereas, analytical recoveries ranged from 96to106%6%.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com