Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(8)
The analytical model predictions are confirmed by finite element data.
Independent finite element simulation confirms the analytical model predictions.
The analytical model predictions are confirmed by finite element analysis and by experimental testing of a proof-of-concept prototype.
The analytical model predictions are compared with two experimental test series dealing with different types of lateral loading.
Representative validation studies are also presented, where the analytical model predictions are compared with results of quasi-static lateral load tests on selected RC column and wall specimens.
The analytical model predictions were compared with computational fluid dynamics results obtained using the FLUENT commercial code for both the laminar and the turbulent flow models.
Similar(52)
Finite element analyses were also conducted to compute the mode I strain energy release rates with and without composite patches, and their results were compared to the analytical model prediction.
To check the validity and accuracy of the analytical model, the predictions are compared with those obtained using the method of computational fluid dynamics (CFD).
Using the analytical model, theoretical predictions of ground surface displacements are compared with experimental data from a dedicated MDPE pipe rig.
Using the analytical model, theoretical predictions of the basic cross-correlation function (BCC) and the GCC PHAT are compared with experimental data from a specially constructed test site in Canada.
Their thermal expansivity was measured and found to match closely the analytical model's prediction.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com