Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(16)
An analytical coefficient of performance (COP) equation was then derived for one of the options using reverse Brayton cycle design.
This assay has a detection limit of 4 nmol/L and the analytical coefficient of variation (CV) of the method is 9.1% at 22 nmol/L.
The analytical coefficient of variation was <3%.
The total analytical coefficient of variation was 7.3%.
The analytical coefficient of variation was about 3%%.
The analytical coefficient of variance for the detection of hypermethylated RASSF1A gene was 10.9%.
Similar(44)
The analytical coefficients of variation were: 5.0 5.2 % for morphine, 6.4 6.9 % for M6G, and 5.9 7.0 % for M3G.
Glucose was analyzed using enzymatic methods with analytical coefficients of variation (CVs) under 2%.
The analytical coefficients of variation for individual OCPs in quality control/quality assurance samples ranged between 10% and 15%.
The analytical coefficients of variation for individual OCPs in quality assurance/quality control samples ranged between 10%and15%5% over the course of the study.
The analytical coefficients of variation for GGT, aspartate transaminase, alanine aminotransferase, plasma glucose, triglycerides, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), uric acid and creatinine were 2%, 1.9%, 1.7%, 1.2%, 2.3%, 2.1%, 2.5%, 0.9% and 1.4%, respectively.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com