The phrase "analysts review" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to the process of analysts examining or evaluating data, reports, or situations.
Example: "The analysts review the quarterly financial reports to identify trends and areas for improvement."
Alternatives: "analysts assessment" or "analysts evaluation".
The analysts review appropriate automatic grouping of data reported by different agencies and formation of individual physical events.
Another possible application is in the intelligence area, where analysts review large amounts of text to search for information, such as on people involved in terrorism events, the weapons used and the targets of the attacks.
When analysts review retail companies to determine whether they are "cheap," they typically calculate the current price-to-earnings ratio of a particular company, and then compare it to the expected rate of earnings growth for that same company.
In addition, some multi-site programs create reports that provide summary information about the datasets to help site analysts review the data.
F.B.I. analysts reviewed tapes of the December test and decided that Dr. Lee's answers were inconclusive, after all.
More than one-quarter of the 57 analysts reviewed had made pre-initial public offering investments in companies they later followed, initiating their coverage with a buy recommendation.
In the meantime, C.I.A. analysts reviewed the proposal and concluded in a classified report this fall that allowing the Russian monitor stations here would raise counterintelligence and other security issues.
The crisis over North Korea's nuclear program began in 1993, when analysts reviewing evidence from American spy satellites concluded that a North Korean nuclear reprocessing center at Yongbyon had gone "hot" -- had begun to process plutonium.
Prior to the data year 1999, the ISC analysts reviewed every seismic event in the ISC Bulletin.
Both analysts reviewed five transcripts with these two codes in mind and highlighted text fragments related to both codes and then met to ensure a common understanding of the relationship between the codes and the raw data.
Fig. 7 Distribution of the annual number of seismic events that fall into different review categories; the ISC analysts reviewed all events "WITH ISSUES", all ISC hypocentres for events that did not have an ISC hypocentre before ("NEW ISC") and all events where an ISC hypocentre is the only hypocentre available ("ISC ONL Y).
