The phrase "analysis when compared with" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the results or findings of an analysis in relation to another subject or data set.
Example: "The analysis when compared with previous studies shows a significant increase in performance metrics."
Alternatives: "evaluation in relation to" or "assessment in comparison to".
In the comparative analysis, when compared with non-fallers, participants who had experienced falling were more likely to have a fall risk (with the exception of history of stroke and use of slippers and sandals).
The result of this analysis, when compared with the expected state of construction, provides progress feedback on the work packages, allowing a project to be monitored more effectively.
Increased congruence with molecular results in our full data set analysis when compared with our extant-only analysis provides clear evidence that the addition of fossils improves the results of morphological parsimony analysis, as intermediate morphologies allow breaking up long branches and provide a root for character polarization.
It was observed that this theory gives most accurate results with respect to 3-D elasticity solutions for bending and stress analysis when compared with existing five degree of freedom shear deformation theories [Reddy JN. A simple higher-order theory for laminated composite plates. J Appl Mech 1984 51 745 52; Touratier M. An efficient standard plate theory.
No significant association was found for any specific subgroup neither in the univariate nor in the multivariate analysis when compared with the non-uveitis group.
It requires small samples of crudes and solvents and also it is a reliable means of crude oil analysis when compared with other existing methods which require the use of fairly large samples and solvents.
Experiment results show that our method are able to improve the quality of sentiment analysis when comparing with several competitive baselines.
Values are presented as means±S.E.M. P values were calculated using an unpaired Student's t test when comparing the control with STNx, and ANOVA followed by post hoc least significant difference analysis when comparing STNx+vehicle with the treatment groups.
A multiple testing approach was applied, with the criteria for inclusion being set to a P-value of <0.05 for the t-tests and a q-value of ≤10% in the SAM analysis, when comparing trisomy 8 with disomy 8 (CT8M only) and when comparing trisomy 8 with disomy 8 (CT8M and references grouped together).
The DFPA analysis results, when compared with those derived by the Tfine code, and the 3D geomechanical model test show that the DFPA code is effective in fully simulating the failure processes of the dam and foundation.
The critical oversaturations and other parameters obtained from such analysis are reasonable when compared with previous work.
