Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
The phrase "analysis were validated using" is not correct in written English due to subject-verb agreement issues.
It can be used when discussing the methods used to confirm the accuracy or reliability of an analysis, but it should be corrected to "analysis was validated using" for proper grammar.
Example: "The results of the study showed that the analysis was validated using multiple data sources."
Alternatives: "the analysis was confirmed using" or "the analysis was verified using".
Exact(13)
Several of the up and downregulated genes identified by microarray analysis were validated using qReal-time RT-PCR.
A number of significantly misregulated gene targets identified by microarray analysis were validated using qPCR of selected genes using aliquots of the same sample pools prepared for probe labeling and primer sets designed by NCBI/Primer-BLAST (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/tools/primer-blast/). Primers are available upon request.
The results of the microarray analysis were validated using rtPCR.
All the selected 15 DEGs selected in the microarray analysis were validated using qPCR.
Ten genes which were altered in expression as determined by microarray analysis were validated using qRT-PCR.
The expression profiles of the miR-30 family members observed in the microarray analysis were validated using qPCR.
Similar(47)
The finite element analysis is validated using an infra-red thermography based experimental mechanics technique known as thermoelastic stress analysis.
The scaling analysis was validated using detailed numerical simulations for different enclosure geometries and outside diurnal climate conditions.
Analysis was validated using PlasmaCAL multi-element QC standard #1 solution (SCP Science, Canada).
Analysis was validated using PlasmaCAL multielement QC standard #1 solution (SCP Science, Baíe Dúrfé, Quebec, Canada).
The miRNA expression analysis was validated using the TaqMan® MicroRNA Assay Kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com