Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
The phrase "analysis were tested by" is not correct in written English.
The subject "analysis" is singular, so it should be "analysis was tested by."
Example: "The analysis was tested by various methods to ensure its accuracy."
Alternatives: "the analysis was evaluated by" or "the analysis was assessed by."
Exact(12)
Statistics were performed by using SPSS® 23.0 and statistical analysis were tested by General Linear Model, Independent samples T-test and Mann-Whitney U test, as appropriate.
Differences observed in the primary analysis were tested by logistic regression including Hb genotype, age categories (1/9, 10/max years), gender and parasite status confirming the role of adaptive genotypes for most of the tested antigens (Table 3).
Only those factors that were significant in the univariate analysis were tested by logistic regression.
All variables with P < 0.2 on univariate analysis were tested by multivariate analysis.
Thirteen genes with differential expression pre and post infection identified from the microarray analysis were tested by qPCR.
Tumor cell invasion assay, MTT assay and FACS analysis were tested by ANOVA, with LSD test for multiple comparisons.
Similar(48)
Suitability of the data for factor analysis was tested by Bartlett's Test of Sphericity,[ 18] which should be significant, and the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) measure of sampling adequacy, which should be >0.6[ 19, 20].
Suitability of the data for factor analysis was tested by Bartlett's Test of Sphericity [ 33] which should be significant, and the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) measure of sampling adequacy, which should be >0.6 [ 34, 35].
Elemental analysis was tested by a VarioELIII elemental analyser, Elementar, Germany.
The possibility of intragenic recombination, which would prohibit the use of the respective loci for phylogenetic analysis, was tested by linkage disequilibrium based statistics as implemented in DnaSP 4.50.3 [46].
Statistical significance in the bivariate analysis was tested by the χ test.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com