The phrase "analysis were retrieved from" is not correct in written English.
The subject "analysis" is singular, so it should be "analysis was retrieved from."
Example: "The analysis was retrieved from the latest research study."
Alternatives: "data were obtained from" or "information was sourced from."
The data used for the analysis were retrieved from the official PISA website.
The data for this current analysis were retrieved from the Knowledge Cluster Initiative (KCI) in Japan.1 This initiative was implemented by the Japanese Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology (MEXT), which made the assessment data available to researchers to examine the performance of these alliances.
The GWAS data for this analysis were retrieved from the Cancer Genetic Markers Susceptibility (CGEMS) database, http://cgems.cancer.gov/about/executive_summary.asp.asp
Gene mutation data for this analysis were retrieved from the Catalogue of Somatic Mutations in Cancer (COSMIC) database (http://www.sanger.ac.uk/genetics/CPG/cosmic) and from the study reports of Hu et al., Hollestelle et al., Sjoblom et al., Wood et al., and Stephens et al. [39], [52], [53], [54], [55].
The sequences used for alignment and phylogeny analysis were retrieved from SWISS-PROT databsae.
Cost data used for our analysis were retrieved from the BNF.
Vegetation cover fractions for a vegetation cover analysis are retrieved from MODIS/Terra imagery from 2000 to 2006, being the period before and after the rising water level of the reservoir.
The data used for the analysis was retrieved from the official PISA website (http://www.pisa.oecd.org).org
The information about platypus, human, and chicken genes used in synteny analysis was retrieved from the latest Ensembl database (Ensembl genes 63).
De-identified data for this analysis was retrieved from the National Institutes of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Disease (NIDDK) Data Repository (https://www.niddkrepository.org/home/) after appropriate institutional review board approval was obtained (University of California San Francisco Committee on Human Research IRB Number: 10 04231).
Critical evaluation and assessment of bias of surveillance with respect to reporting, objectives, host population, sampling, population demographics, organisms, isolate collection, susceptibility testing, data handling and analysis was retrieved from Stephen et al. [ 9] A summary of the components of four major AMR programs that were profiled are provided in Table 1.
