The phrase "analysis were evaluated by" is not correct in written English.
The subject "analysis" is singular, so it should be "analysis was evaluated by."
Example: "The analysis was evaluated by the research team to ensure accuracy."
Alternatives: "evaluation of the analysis by" or "the analysis was assessed by."
Factors attaining a P-value of less than 0.1 in univariate analysis were evaluated by multivariate analysis using Cox proportional hazard regression analyses.
The quality and accuracy of this map for genetic analysis were evaluated by locating the cloned genes, including OsC1 for apicule color [22], a qualitative trait, and GS3 for grain length [23] [24], and GW5/qSW5 for grain width [25] [26], both were QTLs.
Recently identified target genes of NR2E3 [29], or genes identified as differentially expressed between wild type B6 and mutant rd7 retinas by microarray analysis, were evaluated by chromatin immunoprecipitation to identify genes that are co-targeted by both NR1D1 and NR2E3.
Factors that were significant in univariate analysis were evaluated by multivariate analysis, when applicable.
Factors showing predictive value in univariate analysis were evaluated by multivariate analysis in cases where all of these factors were available.
All variables with p<0.1 by univariate analysis were evaluated by stepwise logistic regression for inclusion in the final logistic regression model.
The thermodynamic analyses including energy analysis and exergy analysis are evaluated by using steady-state mathematical model and thermodynamic laws.
The performance of the present technique of inverse analysis is evaluated by several numerical experiments, and is found to be very accurate as well as efficient.
Firstly, the effectiveness of the nonlinear static analysis is evaluated by means of a comparison with a comprehensive set of 84 nonlinear dynamic analyses.
The uncertainty of the analysis is evaluated by actually moving the sample in its undeformed and deformed states, qualifying both image acquisition and correlation steps.
An improved method of seismic fragility analysis is evaluated by comparative analyses to verify its efficiency for practical application to nuclear power plant structures.
