Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
The phrase "analysis were evaluated based on" is not correct in written English.
The subject "analysis" is singular, so it should be "analysis was evaluated based on."
Example: "The analysis was evaluated based on the criteria set forth in the research guidelines."
Alternatives: "evaluation of the analysis was based on" or "the analysis was assessed according to".
Exact(3)
Clade supports of ML analysis were evaluated based on 100 bootstrap resamplings (likelihood bootstrap; LB).
Diagnostic accuracies of SPECT-only analysis and SPECT/CT fused analysis were evaluated based on the definitive diagnoses of TC.
The effective parameters of solar energy, including climatic factors, radiation types, geographic parameters, orientation techniques, height to width ratio (H/W) and landscape analysis, were evaluated based on Famagusta using DuffieBeckman and Stephenson's cousin methods.
Similar(57)
Thermal comfort analysis was evaluated based on ASHRAE standard 55.
Phytochemical analysis (alkaloids, tannins, saponins, flavone and glycosides) were evaluated based on qualitative methods.
The pump inertia force effects were evaluated based on the analysis of reactors employing various flywheels, which had different CDTs (CoastDown flow Times) that ranged from 0 (without a flywheel) to 300 s.
The grasping forces of the wire clamp were evaluated based on finite element analysis (FEA), and the force measurement was presented.
The p-values were evaluated based on permutation test as in the GO analysis.
The final estimates were evaluated based on data fit, adequacy to initial estimates, diagnostic parameters and residual analysis.
Pharmacokinetic parameters were evaluated based on the total F radioactivity measurements in plasma followed by metabolite analysis using radio-HPLC.
Significance: In any statistical analysis, significance is evaluated based on a chosen cut off value (p < α).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com