Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
The phrase "analysis were confirmed in" is not correct in written English.
It contains a grammatical error; "were" should be replaced with "was" to agree with the singular noun "analysis."
Example: "The results of the analysis was confirmed in the final report."
Alternatives: "analysis was validated in" or "analysis was corroborated in".
Exact(4)
Many of the observations of Der et al. [29] who investigated the expression profiles of HT1080 cells (a human fibrosarcoma cell line) after 6 h stimulation with interferons IFNα, β, and γ by microarray analysis, were confirmed in this study.
The results of the primary analysis were confirmed in post hoc sensitivity analysis.
Both prognostic factors found in the univariate analysis were confirmed in the multivariate analysis (Table 3).
Findings of this analysis were confirmed in interviews with applicants and assessors.
Similar(56)
The concepts of finitude and interdependence, absolutely fundamental to environmental analysis, are confirmed in the recognition of the global environment as an essentially closed system.
The structural analysis was confirmed in chimeragenesis experiments focusing on these regions adjacent to the active site cavity, which led to reversal of the activities of LanV and CabV.
Accuracy and prevision of CVA analysis was confirmed in both intra- and inter-day settings, with high levels of recovery from human plasma and RLMs.
This analysis was confirmed in supportive analysis using the paired t test.
This analysis is confirmed in the logbook data, where results are more precise.
Moreover, the presence of specific polymorphic alleles as detected by restriction analysis was confirmed in each case by sequencing of random samples of patients.
The interaction between OsMPK20-4 and OsMPK3 found by yeast two-hybrid analysis was confirmed in planta by co-immunoprecipitation and fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) assays.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com