Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

analysis was repeated

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "analysis was repeated" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where you want to indicate that a particular analysis has been conducted multiple times for verification or consistency. Example: "To ensure accuracy, the analysis was repeated several times under different conditions."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

The analysis was repeated after five minutes.

The experimental analysis was repeated three times.

Each analysis was repeated three times.

Science

Rice

Each reference analysis was repeated twice for each sample.

Science

Rice

The analysis was repeated for humerus, ulna and radius.

This analysis was repeated three times for each test.

Experimental analysis was repeated three times and the results were statistically analyzed.

Next, the analysis was repeated for each room and considering only the summer or winter periods.

This analysis was repeated in the following three positions: Assumed that underground water is not available.

The analysis was repeated with just two categories, shallow and deep.

That analysis was repeated for the data from 3 days before the diagnosis.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When reporting scientific findings, explicitly state the number of times the "analysis was repeated" to ensure transparency and demonstrate the robustness of your results.

Common error

Avoid stating that "analysis was repeated" without clarifying the reason for repetition or any modifications made during the process. Always provide context for why the analysis was repeated and whether the procedure remained consistent.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

83%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "analysis was repeated" serves as a declarative statement indicating that a particular analytical process has been conducted more than once. Ludwig AI indicates this usage is correct. Examples from Ludwig show this phrase in scientific and technical writing.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

98%

Formal & Business

1%

News & Media

1%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "analysis was repeated" is grammatically correct and very common, especially within scientific contexts. Ludwig confirms its proper usage. It is used to indicate the reiteration of an analytical process, usually to validate findings or ensure accuracy. It's crucial to specify the number of repetitions and any modifications made during the process. Common alternatives include "the analysis was replicated" or "the experiment was rerun". While the phrase is generally used in formal and scientific writing, it's essential to provide context and clarity when using it to avoid ambiguity.

FAQs

Why is it important to indicate that an analysis was repeated?

Repeating an analysis and reporting it increases the reliability and validity of research findings. It demonstrates that the results are consistent and not due to chance or error.

What are some alternatives to saying "analysis was repeated"?

You can use alternatives like "the analysis was replicated", "the study was reanalyzed", or "the experiment was rerun" depending on the specific context.

How does repeating an analysis contribute to scientific rigor?

Repeating an analysis helps to confirm initial results, identify potential sources of error, and ensure that the findings are reproducible. Reproducibility is a cornerstone of scientific rigor.

Is it always necessary to repeat an analysis multiple times?

The necessity of repeating an analysis depends on the nature of the study, the complexity of the data, and the desired level of confidence in the results. In many scientific fields, repeating the analysis at least three times is a standard practice.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

83%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: