The phrase "analysis was available for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the accessibility of analysis related to a specific subject or dataset.
Example: "The report indicated that analysis was available for the previous year's sales data."
Alternatives: "analysis could be accessed for" or "analysis was provided for".
As a result, complete fMRI analysis was available for seven experienced (range of experience 6.5 to 18 years, mean = 9.21 years, SD = 4.04 years, 5 female) and seven inexperienced participants (range of experience 0 to 4 years, mean = .71 years, SD = 1.50 years, 4 female).
The largest study, analyzing the history of 473 Dutch DMD patients diagnosed from 1961 to 1982, provides limited information, since neither muscle biopsy nor genetic analysis was available for most cases, data was collected by a questionnaire sent to physicians, and clinical practices were not described [8].
Written informed consent for the collection of samples and subsequent analysis was available for all patients.
SF analysis was available for 51 patients (40 ACPA positive/11 negative).
A paired plasma alcohol analysis was available for 72 patients [55 (76.4%) male] with dimethoate detected in plasma.
EGFR mutation analysis was available for 53 patients, 24 were positive for exon 19 or exon 21 mutations (Fig. 2).
Polarization analysis is available for the investigation of magnetic nano-structures.
A third option, chromatographic separation (LC) before MS analysis, is available for the detection of cyclics in complex mixtures.
In addition, a wide range of commercial and in-house-developed software packages for MRI and MRS analysis are available for use on all workstations.
It is clearly of interest to examine what type of analysis is available for those cases where the assumption of stationarity becomes untrue or unrealistic.
Discussion: Although the data required for the analysis were available for only three environmental chemicals (methylmercury, organophosphate pesticides, lead), the results suggest that their contributions to neurodevelopmental morbidity are substantial, exceeding those of many nonchemical risk factors.
