Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(9)
In the final analysis, the answer is undoubtedly yes.
Given our discussion above concerning contingency and infinite analysis, the answer should be relatively clear.
Analysis: The answer to this question came by way of an accident, much like Fleming discovering penicillin, and of equal importance to the world.
Based on the present analysis, the answer is no.
For statistical analysis, the answer scale was dichotomized into "excellent/very good/good" and "less well/bad".
To qualify as a sensitivity analysis, the answer to all of the above questions should be yes.
Similar(51)
For part of the analysis, the answers from question 15 were categorized into either evolutionary positions or creationist positions.
For analysis, the answers were dichotomized ("none"/ low" and "high"/ very high").
In the statistical analysis the answers "very good/good" were combined into one group, versus the answers "bad/very bad".
In the analysis, the answers were divided into three groups: "(1) very difficult, (2) difficult," "(3) normal" and "(4) well off (5) very well off".
For a more in-depth analysis, the answers to each question were also analyzed separately by a person with no prior contact with the project (J.T).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com