The phrase "analysis suggested a significant" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the findings or conclusions drawn from a study or research analysis, particularly in academic or scientific contexts.
Example: "The analysis suggested a significant correlation between the two variables, indicating a potential relationship worth further investigation."
Alternatives: "analysis indicated a notable" or "analysis revealed a substantial".
Further analysis suggested a significant interaction effect among the three chemicals for the enhancement of extracellular production.
In particular, the linear regression analysis suggested a significant positive correlation between N2O fluxes and nirK-nosZ value (r 2 = 0.80, p < 0.001) in the both pile types (Fig. 6b), which could also serve as a good predictor in regression model for stimulating N2O emissions from windrow composting systems.
Subgroup analysis suggested a significant association between CD209 -336genotypeype status and protection against lung cavitation.
Pathway analysis suggested a significant involvement of these genes with AKT and MAPK signaling.
The species level analysis suggested a significant correlation between migration and roost use as well as between migration and geographic distribution (Table 1).
Regression analysis suggested a significant positive correlation between changes in the number of active LMW-GS genes and variations in ZSV among the eight genotypes (r = 0.903, p≤0.01, Figure S4).
Overall, the gene ontology and canonical pathway analysis suggests a significant and dynamic impact on cellular pathways that are important for host immunity during CDC1551 infection.
The results of the present meta-analysis suggest a significant reduction in physician-diagnosed asthma as a result of interventions to reduce exposure to house dust (RR = 0.74; 95% CI, 0.58 0.95).
Initial psychometric assessments of pediatric acute care nurse responses [ 44] provided evidence for acceptability, internal consistency reliability (α ≥ 0.70 for 10 of 13 concepts), and validity: Principal component analysis suggested a 13-factor solution, statistically significant correlations between instrumental RU and all but one ACT concepts were found.
Smaller randomised trials, 4 as well as non-randomised studies 5 and a recent meta-analysis 6 suggested a significant clinical benefit, but three randomised studies failed to do so.
However, notably, genotype association analysis for rs204993 suggested a significant association with SCZ under a recessive model, and the AA genotype of rs204993 was associated with a higher risk of SCZ (P = 0.027; OR = 1.460; 95% CI, 1.043 2.054).
