Suggestions(1)
Exact(1)
Bivariate analysis suggested a high prevalence of MSDs among waste pickers, particularly in the lower back (54%), knee (48%), upper back (40%) and shoulder (32%) compared to the control group (36%, 35 %, 21 % and 12 respectively).
Similar(59)
The infrared analysis suggested a higher extent of oxidation when increasing the temperature.
The data analysis suggested a higher possibility for the formation and growth of TiBw as the temperature elevated in the sintering step (1400 °C).
The preliminary results on the few spruce samples we examined [11] by neutron-activation analysis suggested a higher concentration of minerals than in natural spruce.
Further exploratory analysis suggested a higher risk of single ventricle and atrioventricular septal defect.
Molecular analysis suggested a higher correlation of the drug resistance phenotype with the miRNA rather than the mRNA expression profile.
An exploratory analysis suggested a higher rate of in-field progression in patients with an immunosuppressive comorbidity or prior recent chemotherapy versus those without (30%and9%9%, respectively; P = 0.03).
Moreover, 90-day mortality analysis suggested a higher incidence of death among the patients with BSIs, although this finding was not significant (p=0.0544; table 2).
For the overall prevalence of musculoskeletal problems, logistic regression analysis suggested a higher risk for female pathologists (p=0.024, effect coefficient (EC): 0.282), more weekly working hours (p=0.023, EC: 2.489) and surprisingly, fewer hours spent at the computer (p=0.033, EC: 0.801).
In contrast, at 750 °C the CSS behaviour is characterised by a rapid saturation of the stress amplitude, regardless of the applied strain amplitude, while the deformation structure analysis suggests a high activation of dislocation climb which is confirmed by in situ TEM ageing showing shrinkage of prismatic loops.
Our retrospective analysis suggests a high rate of oseltamivir resistance conferred by the H275Y mutation in treated immunocompromised patients.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com