The phrase "analysis severity" is not standard in written English and may cause confusion.
It could be used in contexts discussing the seriousness or intensity of an analysis, but it is not commonly recognized.
Example: "The analysis severity of the data indicates that immediate action is required to address the issues identified."
Alternatives: "analysis intensity" or "analysis criticality".
After Cox regression analysis, severity of clinical manifestations [hazard ratio (HR) 6.86, 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.05 15.43] and inadequacy of antimicrobial therapy (HR 2.27, 95%CI 1.02 5.09) remained as risk factors for mortality.
On multivariate analysis, severity of disease was highly correlated with serum vitamin A levels.
At the initial analysis, severity of drought and intensity of flood for country have been analyzed under the GHG scenario.
After linear regression analysis, severity of thrombocytopenia remained associated with sepsis (p < 0.01) and thrombi (p < 0.01).
In multivariable analysis, severity of illness measures, admission to a medical ICU and length of ICU stay prior to developing ALI were all associated with in-hospital mortality.
In univariate analysis, severity of disease was significantly associated with age, presence of pneumonia as well as with a history of an underlying medical condition, in particular, immunosuppression, chronic lung disease, cardiovascular disease, renal impairment, and diabetes (Table 2).
Moreover, the analysis confuses severity as a population descriptor with severity as a descriptor of individual patients within that population.
For the analysis of severity, we compared individuals who had moderate to severe symptoms (with at least monthly frequency) to asymptomatic population controls, and excluded individuals with mild severity (N = 75).
The analysis of severity of andropausal symptoms revealed that in the middle-aged group (40 59 years), the severity of sexual (P<0.001), psychological (P<0.002), and all andropausal symptoms (P<0.001) was greater in prediabetic men compared with the same in healthy peers.
The seven factor scores were entered as independent variables in a discriminant function analysis on severity of glaucoma data (ocular hypertension, mild, moderate and severe).
For our analysis, disease severity was classified according to FEV1 levels as mild, moderate, severe and very severe following the European Respiratory Society and the American Thoracic Society (ERS/ATS) criteria [ 17].
