Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(26)
To withstand our strict scrutiny analysis, respondents must demonstrate that the university's use of race in its current admission program employs "narrowly tailored measures that further compelling governmental interests".
Usually in conjoint analysis respondents have to rank conception cards based on their preferences.
In our analysis respondents (49, 89 %) demonstrated a great deal of self-efficacy, in that they can find solutions to problems if they try hard enough.
For the purpose of subgroup analysis, respondents were assigned to either a 'low-caseload group' or a 'high-caseload group', depending on the frequency of exposure to suspected pneumothorax cases and the frequency of LUS usage.
For the analysis, respondents with incomplete information were excluded (n = 234).
For this analysis, respondents answering not knowledgeable were recoded as having no interest.
Similar(34)
After adjusting for confounders in the multivariate analysis, respondent gender being female (OR 1.09, 95% CI 1.00 1.18) and, and the respondent being a grandparent (OR 1.14, 95% CI 1.02 1.27) or other non-parent, non-sibling relative (OR 1.11, 95% CI 1.00 1.18) were significantly associated with increased physician agreement.
Pearson χ test was used to test the difference between groups of categorical data, including analysis between respondents and non-respondents when pertinent.
We assessed risk factors for not responding at 2 years of follow-up in multivariate analysis, using respondents (value = 0) vs. non-respondents (value = 1) as dependent variable.
The analysis excluded respondents that were irrelevant for the analysis, ie, respondents that had never had sex (n = 52) and respondents who had not had sexual intercourse in the past 12 months (n = 159).
We excluded from the analysis two respondents who delivered on the way to the health facility and one respondent who did not answer the question on marital status.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com