The phrase "analysis reported to be" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing findings or conclusions that have been communicated or documented by others.
Example: "The analysis reported to be inconclusive has raised further questions about the study's methodology."
Alternatives: "analysis stated to be" or "analysis claimed to be".
The results of the numerical analysis were reported to be consistent with those obtained during the strength tests.
Parallel Analysis is reported to be the most accurate method of determining the number of components to be extracted [ 56, 57, 62].
As miRNAs function by targeting the 3′ untranslated region (3′UTR) of mRNA with base-pair complementarity, bioinformatical analysis was reported to be a powerful method to predict the target gene.
Also this is in agreement with results of meta-analyses, where a pooled DFS hazard ratio for Ki-67 overexpression in multivariate analysis was reported to be 1.76-1.84 [ 19, 22].
This helper application requires either an input file representing the analysis report to be parsed, e.g. a fastqc_data.txt file, or a StatsDB metadata table file (see Table 1) comprising multiple analysis reports.
For instance, in [27], the authors have undertaken a probabilistic study with optimal PMU placement, wherein the most credible contingencies are evaluated for fault analysis; consequently, the total time for the execution of fault analysis procedure is reported to be 0.4 s, which is largely due to the processing time required to detect the fault due to the limited number of PMUs.
By exploiting long-term time variation information based on the modulation frequency analysis, it is reported to be especially robust against time scale modification (TSM) at the cost of higher computation complexity.
Sensitivity of the FISH analysis has been reported to be 93.5%-100% in a case-dependent manner [ 6, 9].
Such quantification based on texture analysis has been reported to be helpful for prognosis in oncological applications.
Standardised uptake values have been shown to be reliable in differentiating between benign and malignant lesions in a number of situations, but in others visual analysis has been reported to be equivalent (Lowe et al, 1994).
