Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(1)
14Dustmann (2003b) also constructs his analysis on this argument.
Similar(59)
(See Wong (2010) for a detailed analysis of this argument and responses on behalf of the emergentist).
After critically evaluating previous data provided to support this hypothesis, I suggest on both theoretical grounds and on re-analysis that this argument is unlikely and unsupported.
Our analysis supports this argument.
Our analysis supports this argument in all three datasets.
The Sampled analysis further buttresses this argument.
Based on this argument, imposing a minimum progeny size for sires to be considered in the analysis seemed a natural choice.
The rest of their "analysis" on this key point -- a point on which their entire argument depends -- consists of simply regurgitating industry talking points about the burdensome nature of the rule requirements.
(See Benacerraf 1996 for some later reflections on this argument).
Several remarks on this argument are in order.
(On this argument and its peculiarities, see Dancy, 2002).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com