The phrase "analysis of the science" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the examination or evaluation of scientific concepts, methods, or findings.
Example: "The analysis of the science behind climate change reveals significant patterns that require urgent attention."
Alternatives: "examination of the science" or "evaluation of the science".
"Gaining that consensus, based on an analysis of the science, was the critical achievement".
On the Guardian Sport Network you will read content on a fascinating range of subjects, including detailed analysis of the science of sport, sports law, and US, Portuguese, Brazilian and Argentinian football.
If the panel's analysis of the science is correct, thousands of men were probably harmed by unnecessary tests and treatments during the delay.
Analysis of the science data is now in progress, scheduled to complete in 2007.
Our staff felt that this post best encapsulated what we wanted to see in our guest blog coverage: a well-written, insightful analysis of the science being discussed at the meeting.
Its reports, published roughly every 5 years, have shaped the debate through careful analysis of the science and impact of climate change, and of ways to mitigate and adapt to it.
Using data from the 2006 PISA survey, we performed cross-classified multilevel analysis on the science performance of 9.279 15-year-old 15-year-old 15-year-oldnating fromigrantfferent childrens, living in 16 Western coriginating destination.
This will be followed by a statistical analysis of the science-enabling capability of the IUGONET, together with a discussion of the overarching objectives for future developments.
David Hull, in his (1988) argues that because the overall structure of reward and punishment in the sciences is a powerful incentive not to cheat, further epistemological analysis of the sciences is unnecessary.
Analysis of the science-process tests also revealed statistically significant increases in students' average scores for quantitative analysis of the data.
Polkinghorne was both a scientist and a clergyman and we believe that his views, and the views of the committee he chaired, represent a fair analysis of both the science and ethical and moral dimensions of the subject when the report was written in 1993.
