The phrase "analysis of the publications" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the examination or evaluation of various published works, such as articles, books, or research papers.
Example: "The analysis of the publications revealed significant trends in the field of environmental science."
Alternatives: "examination of the publications" or "evaluation of the publications".
Empirically, the discussion is informed by interviews, secondary data analysis and the analysis of the publications trail relating to the debate about the ERC between 2002 and 2004.
Motivated by its 40th anniversary in 2016, this study aims to develop a bibliometric analysis of the publications of the journal between 1976 and 2015.
As a result of this tendency, a cluster analysis of the publications in the database yields a partition that is largely the same as the a priori division into the three fields.
A bibliometric analysis of the publications on the CSP systems and components since 1990 shows a total of 6400+ publications and reveals an exponential growth due to reasons that CSP systems promises a lot of potential as the future large scale power source for varied applications.
Analysis of the publications demonstrates that some of the FTA methods used here themselves deployed ICT: to increase the number of experts and stakeholders that could be involved, to speed up the FTA, and/or to facilitate analyses of large amounts of data [108].
This is a secondary analysis of the publications included above.
This paper presents an analysis of the publication scholarship trends of articles published within Healthcare Infection, providing insight into future publication trends.
The main research development country is England, and from the analysis of the publication year, the number of papers is increasing peaking in 25% of the total in 2010.
In a cracking new analysis of the "publication bias" in the literature, a group of academics this week published a paper in the New England Journal of Medicine which listed all the trials on SSRIs that had ever been formally registered with the Food and Drug Administration, and then went to look for the same trials in the academic literature.
The analysis of the publication years of the references cited by all the papers in a specific research field shows that (earlier) publication years are not equally represented.
An analysis of the publication data in CMR has shown that radiologists initially authored most of the publications involving cardiac MR, but now the balance has shifted [2].
