The phrase "analysis of the methodological" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the examination or evaluation of methods used in research or a particular study.
Example: "The analysis of the methodological approaches employed in the study revealed several areas for improvement."
Alternatives: "examination of the methods" or "evaluation of the methodologies".
We then added a sketch, and a preliminary analysis, of the methodological innovations in his more mainstream mathematical writings, from his work in algebraic number theory to other areas.
Indeed, the analysis of the methodological quality of the selected studies was hampered by the poor quality of reporting.
Analysis of the methodological quality of the selected studies was greatly hampered by the poor reporting of the studies.
As shown in a descriptive literature analysis of the methodological implementation of overviews, many authors used the GRADE approach to evaluate the quality of evidence [ 68].
After the search phase, we performed an analysis of the methodological quality of each article selected for this review, based on an adapted version of the Cochrane Collaboration Tool for Assessing the Risk of Bias [ 44].
Whether or not there is a relationship between use of mobile phones (analogue and digital cellulars, and cordless) and head tumour risk (brain tumours, acoustic neuromas, and salivary gland tumours) is still a matter of debate; progress requires a critical analysis of the methodological elements necessary for an impartial evaluation of contradictory studies.
This decompositional conception of analysis set the methodological agenda for philosophical approaches and debates in the (late) modern period (nineteenth and twentieth centuries).
The findings are based on an analysis of the theoretical and methodological literature of planning and design.
To our knowledge, our study represents the first comparative analysis of the reporting of methodological quality of clinical trials in resource-rich versus resource-poor parts of the world.
We also carried out a descriptive analysis of the type of methodological changes requested in the peer reviewers' comments and the extent to which authors responded to these requests in their manuscript revision.
The key items for inclusion in the present paper were based on the collective expertise of the group along with analysis of key methodological shortcomings of published research in the area identified by recent systematic reviews.
