The phrase "analysis of the instruments" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where you are discussing the examination or evaluation of various tools or devices, often in a scientific or technical setting.
Example: "The analysis of the instruments revealed significant discrepancies in the data collected during the experiment."
Alternatives: "examination of the instruments" or "evaluation of the instruments".
Results and analysis of the instrument's context suitability and limitations are discussed below.
Then, the numerical analysis of the instrument metrological performance is shown, by focusing both on deterministic errors and uncertainty effects, with the aim of addressing main design challenges.
Analysis of the Instrument Vibrations and Contact Forces Caused by an Expert Robotic Surgeon Doing FRS Tasks.
The measurement models were based on factor analysis of the instrument NEUPSILIN-Inf, proposed by Salles et al. (2014), using maximum likelihood (ML) as an estimation method.
After a brief description of the instrument's operating principles, a thorough analysis of the instrument's behavior is presented, as well as a characterization of its environment in flight, using an alternative high sampling rate (burst) scalar mode that could be run a few days during commissioning.
'Only an analysis of the instrument, i.e., the interaction of the artifact and the utilization schemes of its users (teachers and students), the analysis of its instrumental genesis will help in the implementation of computers, software and communication technology in the mathematics classroom' (Laborde and Sträßer 2010, p. 131).
Factorial analysis of the instrument revealed a five-factor structure that gathers social skills of (1) coping and self-assertion with risk, (2) self-assertion in the expression of positive affect, (3) conversation and social confidence, (4) self-exposure to unknown people and new situations, (5) self-control of aggressiveness.
The internal consistency and confirmatory factor analysis of the instrument were assessed.
Factor analysis of the instrument, originally developed to consist of 28 items, revealed the following five factors [ 10].
Analysis of the instrument's systematic error revealed strong correlations between test and retest suggesting good reproducibility.
