The phrase "analysis of resource use" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where you are discussing the examination or evaluation of how resources are utilized, such as in environmental studies, economics, or project management.
Example: "The analysis of resource use in our recent project revealed several areas where we could improve efficiency and reduce waste."
Alternatives: "evaluation of resource consumption" or "assessment of resource utilization".
METHODS: Data from the 1996 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey were used in a cross-sectional analysis of resource use and costs.
While many studies report some analysis of resource use and cost data, these analyses rarely aim to contribute to developing analytical methods.
Further support is provided by the analysis of resource use by country, which demonstrated that higher levels of resource use were observed in countries with higher initial antibiotic treatment modification rates.
On the basis of an observational case study of 27 hard-to-heal ulcers an alternative cost-effectiveness estimate was established, using a prospective analysis of resource use and cost for Dermagraft.
This is due to the lack of large administrative databases linked with diagnosis that would provide the basis for analysis of resource use, rendering most cost-effectiveness studies to rely on published sources (Karnon and Brown, 2002).
Table 3 presents the estimates as found by the statistical analysis: the association of resource use costs and medication costs with socio-demographic characteristics and clinical aspects was examined by means of a between-regression model.
An emerging area of research is analysis in which components of resource use or costs are modelled separately under a common analytical framework.
As TRIGGER was a feasibility trial intended to inform the design of a subsequent definitive trial incorporating a full cost-effectiveness analysis, a formal comparison of resource use and costs between trial arms was not planned.
The analysis only considered the cost of resource use for the "average infant," and no attempt was made to stratify resource use and costs according to sex, comorbidities, suitability of infants for different formulas, and other disease-related factors.
We have therefore used the LOS in our analysis, which is the main determinant of resource use and is readily available in most studies.
