The phrase "analysis in comparing with" is not correct in standard written English.
It is unclear and awkwardly constructed, making it difficult to understand the intended meaning.
Example: "The analysis in comparing with previous studies reveals significant differences in outcomes."
Alternatives: "analysis in comparison to" or "analysis when compared with".
Some of the results obtained in the analysis are compared with those present in the existing literature.
We adjusted the analyses for sex, season (the larger variation in this analysis compared with the cytokine analysis allowed us to control for season rather than month), MUAC, and subsequent vaccinations.
Although in univariate analysis a trend in DSS was noted (P = 0.08) in favor of the physician-detected group, in multivariate analysis, when compared with detection by patients, no significant difference could be found (Figs. 1, 2).
In an American study, performance with the BAX® system in feed analysis was compared with a most probable number (MPN) method [ 15].
The dose range, sample size, and number of samples per subject were relatively small in our analysis compared with typical First In Human (FIH) study designs to evaluate a worst case setting.
In addition, 22.1% of patients had peritoneal carcinomatosis, which was a poor prognostic factor in multivariate analysis, compared with 8% of patients in the Japanese trial.
The odds ratios in this analysis were compared with the results of the original analysis.
All proteins from all four Brachyspira genomes in the analysis were compared with the COG database [ 28].
This assumes ongoing medication use and we would expect the A1C improvements to be larger in this analysis as compared with the more conservative ITT analysis.
In all cohorts except MAAS, children with highly educated parents and with allergic parents were somewhat overrepresented in the analysis population compared with the baseline population.
