The phrase "analysis in a trial" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in legal contexts to refer to the examination or evaluation of evidence and arguments presented during a trial.
Example: "The analysis in a trial is crucial for determining the outcome of the case."
Alternatives: "evaluation during a trial" or "examination in a trial".
For example, the expansion of exclusion criteria to ensure that children with unrecognized HIV infections were not included was recommended by the DMC subsequent to interim analysis in a trial comparing the use of oral amoxicillin with injectable penicillin for severe pneumonia [ 6].
The purpose of this study was to perform a responder analysis and calculate the associated NNTs to examine the influence of response thresholds and the time point chosen for analysis, in a trial comparing etoricoxib, naproxen, and placebo in AS [ 12].
Finally, the system achieved quick response in processing the large administrative database to allow convenient ad-hoc analysis in a trial-and-error fashion.
The results were shown to be robust in a number of sensitivity analyses, including an analysis from which trials that did not report outcomes at 6 months were excluded, and an analysis in which a trial with only three injections in the first 6 months was included.
Trial sequential analysis is similar to interim analysis in a single trial where the monitoring boundaries are used to decide whether the P value is sufficiently small to show the anticipated effect and whether the trial should be terminated early.
Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) based screening for prostate cancer (PCa) has been shown to reduce prostate specific mortality by 20% in an intention to screen (ITS) analysis in a randomised trial (European Randomised Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer [ERSPC]).
Our aim was to establish the feasibility and reliability of high throughput RNA analysis in a prospective trial.
A pilot study of responder analysis in a single trial indicated that it might be a useful way of reporting pain results in osteoarthritis.
This test presupposes that a primary meta-analytic result can be identified in each systematic review (analogous to a primary analysis in a clinical trial).
Performing an analysis in a MAMS trial which ignores the stopping guidelines for lack-of-benefit may result in biased treatment effect estimates [ 15].
A study has been made of the way in which the number of events available for analysis in a clinical trial was dependent on the recruitment period, the maximum follow-up time on individual patients and the length of time between the start of the trial and its analysis.
