Exact(5)
In view of the 30 events observed, we did not strictly follow the classical rule of a minimum of 10 outcome events per predictor variable in the multivariable analysis [29], but our analysis fulfilled the minimum of 5 events per predictor variable proposed by recent simulation studies [30].
Like the first analysis, this second analysis fulfilled the predefined criteria; Eigenvalue > 1 and KMO = 0.837.
All microarrays included in the analysis fulfilled our established quality parameters [Supplemental data (http://ehp.niehs.nih.gov/txg/members/2004/7036/7036supplement.pdf)].
> -wrap-foot> All three cases included in this microarray analysis fulfilled the criteria of highly active acute multiple sclerosis and care was taken to select comparable lesion stages from the material by tissue microdissection.
In view of the 30 events observed, we did not strictly follow the classical rule of a minimum of 10 outcome events per predictor variable in the multivariable analysis [ 29], but our analysis fulfilled the minimum of 5 events per predictor variable proposed by recent simulation studies [ 30].
Similar(54)
Furthermore, bacterial secretory proteins and few hypothetical proteins identified in our analysis fulfill the criteria of vaccine candidates.
A total of 11 health facilities were involved in the analysis, fulfilling WHO recommendation to cover at least 25-30% of the health facilities in the area when assessing quality of care [ 13, 14].
In total, 166 reviews including a meta-analysis fulfilled all criteria and were included in this systematic review [ 10- 175].
Studies included in this meta-analysis fulfilled the following selection criteria: 1) Case control studies with a healthy control arm.
All seven studies included in the meta-analysis fulfilled nine or more of the 14 criteria in the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool for methodologic quality.
11 of 20 studies in this meta-analysis fulfilled 18 or more of the 25 items in the STARD (Additional file 1: Table S1).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com