The first column replicates column 6 from the simple hazard analysis for comparison.
Economic analysis for comparison of cavitation phenomena with other conventional techniques of disinfection has been discussed.
Due to the limited amount of patients, the initial study investigated a small-sized group without performing statistical analysis for comparison among conventional and 3D printed casts.
Significantly modulated genes (p < 0.05; ∣ > 2∣-fold change) were selected based on ANVOVA with contrast analysis for comparison of difference storage conditions and storage time.
The analysis for comparison is based on (i) the change in engineering parameters such as yield strength and elastic modulus at room temperature (RT), and at 77 K, (ii) the strain tolerance and degree of degradation of the critical current (Ic) for each tape at 77 K.
A calibrator control and GAPDH control were included in every analysis for comparison.
Two lines expressing AtHMA4-C-term were also included in this analysis for comparison.
We used a repeated (neutral vs cocaine-cues) factorial (male vs female) contrast ANOVA analysis for comparison.
Hence, we included Daic, Hmong-Mien, Sino-Tibetan, Austronesian, and Austroasiatic populations in the PC analysis for comparison.
All spectral data were processed and analyzed by principal component analysis for comparison of the metabolite profiles.
Two other existing tests, namely combined multivariate collapsing test (CMC) [15] and group-wise weighted sum statistic test (GWWS) [16], were also included in our analysis for comparison.
