The phrase "analysis due to poor" is not complete and lacks clarity in written English.
It can be used in contexts where you are discussing the reasons for a particular analysis, but it needs to be followed by a noun to specify what is poor.
Example: "The analysis due to poor performance revealed several areas for improvement."
Alternatives: "evaluation resulting from inadequate" or "assessment stemming from subpar".
Five out of these 26 participants were not included in the final analysis due to poor memory performance (<66% general accuracy) compared with the rest of the group (t24 = 6.65, P < .01).01
Additionally, there are issues relating to poor prediction of reservoir properties and lithofacies from core analysis due to poor core sample quality and preservation techniques.
For the last category, Data Rejected (colored in grey), the required data were inadequate for analysis due to poor instrument practice, exhibited extremely poor S/N or contained indiscernible artefacts or impurities, etc.
Data from three participants (all male) were not included in the analysis due to poor equipment calibration.
Both PGM loci were dropped from the analysis due to poor quality bands and inconsistent banding patterns among replicates.
The pooled samples of S. biwaensis captured from the eastern rocky zone (BE) were excluded from the analysis due to poor measurement conditions.
Body morphology was analyzed in a subset of 1985 F2 fish, with some individuals being removed from the analysis due to poor-quality digital images.
Even from the data that is available in these repositories, about two-thirds might be unusable for meta-analysis due to poor quality or missing raw files (Larsson and Sandberg, 2006).
These findings are consistent with those of Lu et al. The differences with previous literature can be explained in part by the fact that several studies often excluded small specimens from the analysis due to inadequate material, poor orientation, or lack of agreement in the distinction between HP and SSA/Ps.
In addition, six patients were excluded from the principal analysis due to 'poor model fit'.
Four patients (5%) were excluded from the analysis due to a poor resolution of 2D echocardiography as a consequence of poor ultrasonic window (obesity or pulmonary disease) that did not allow speckle-tracking imaging and 1 (<1%) due to refusal of gated-SPECT after echocardiography.
