The phrase "analysis did not vary" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the consistency or stability of an analysis over time or across different conditions.
Example: "In our study, we found that the analysis did not vary, indicating a reliable outcome across all test subjects."
Alternatives: "analysis remained consistent" or "analysis showed no variation."
Overall, the number of atoms aligned (hashed bars) in each analysis did not vary significantly (p = >0.0001), thus indicating that the alignments across various structures were of equal integrity.
The distribution of Candida species in this analysis did not vary significantly over the study period, but it differs from data in other published epidemiological studies in Europe that involved a 400 mg dose of fluconazole on a daily basis.
The results of the adjusted analysis did not vary substantially, apart from an expected loss in precision of the estimates: SEI difference = 0.12 (-0.04 to 0.28; P = 0.12) and AUC difference = -48.76 (-103.06 to 5.54; P = 0.07).
Since the unit costs used in the analysis do not vary by the grade or specialty of the doctors seen in the A&E department, the observed variation in costs by the type of doctor relate to variations in surgery and length of stay, which in turn are affected by injury severity.
SMN protein levels measured by Western blot analysis also did not vary with SMN1 copy number in lymphoblasts or fibroblasts (not shown).
Post [3] noted that, in his meta-analysis, discrimination did not vary significantly with organism body size, between species, functional groups or even habitats, but stressed that average discrimination factors can only be applied to entire food webs, with many multiple trophic pathways and species.
The proportion of cases excluded from analysis as DCOs did not vary by year of diagnosis or by deprivation category.
†One participant with unknown education level was excluded from analysis because the outcome did not vary in this stratum.
In univariate analysis, plasma HIV-1 RNA did not vary by East or Southern African region (p = 0.15), but did vary by age, gender, and CD4 count.
Statistical analysis first determined that GAPDH did not vary under test conditions (one-way ANOVA; OPG p = 0.61; MG63 p = 0.67).
When this sensitivity analysis was performed, the data did not vary in any material way from that presented here.
