Sentence examples for analysis confirmed significant differences from inspiring English sources

The phrase "analysis confirmed significant differences" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where research findings or statistical results indicate that there are notable variations between groups or conditions being studied.
Example: "The analysis confirmed significant differences in the test scores between the two groups, suggesting that the new teaching method was effective."
Alternatives: "the analysis revealed significant differences" or "the analysis indicated significant differences."

Exact(1)

Statistical analysis confirmed significant differences in oxidative stress between virulent and non-virulent strains (p < 0.0005) whereas no significant differences between CECT 10431 and W303 or 60 and D14 were found (Additional file 1: Table S5).

Similar(59)

Analysis of variance confirmed significant differences among pCO2 treatments (Cv 1: F3,8 = 11.8026, n = 12, P = 0.0026).

In another analysis by month, we confirmed significant differences due to perturbation in all months from June to September.

The statistical analysis using the non-parametric test of Kruskal-Wallis confirmed significant differences (p<0.025) between liver, muscles and blubber for total and carcinogenic PAHs.

After confirming significant differences (p < 0.05) using Kruskal-Wallis analysis, the differences were then examined by applying Dunnett's test.

This confirms significant differences among all combinations.

The qPCR analysis confirmed the significant differences in the quantitative response of these different group members to the different abiotic and biotic stress treatments observed using the mRNA-seq analysis.

The survival analysis confirmed the significant differences between the groups concerning diarrhoea cases per day at risk (p < 0.05).

Subgroup analysis confirmed no significant differences in either tissue mRNA or protein levels between patients who received preoperative chemotherapy and those who did not (data not shown).

ANOVA analysis confirmed no significant difference in the extent of extraction from pouches 1, 2 and 3 (p>0.05).

Survival analysis confirmed a significant difference between the groups in terms of 90-day mortality (Tarone Ware χ2 = 24.98, p < 0.0001) with a survival rate as low as 12.5% among patients with tachycardia plus abnormal MFI (Fig. 1b).

Show more...

Ludwig, your English writing platform

Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.

Student

Used by millions of students, scientific researchers, professional translators and editors from all over the world!

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

Get started for free

Unlock your writing potential with Ludwig

Letters

Most frequent sentences: