The phrase "analysis clearly show" is not correct as it should be "analysis clearly shows" to agree with the singular noun "analysis." You can use it when discussing the findings of a single analysis that presents clear results or conclusions.
Example: "The analysis clearly shows that there is a significant correlation between the two variables."
Alternatives: "The analysis clearly indicates" or "The analysis clearly demonstrates."
The results of this analysis clearly show that any fixed-points-theory-based conventional method could provide, at best, only locally but not globally optimal parameters.
The results of the applications of system characteristic analysis clearly show that the effects of different configuration characteristics on the system properties can be effectively analysed and evaluated, enabling the optimization of system configurations.
The results of a mechanistic analysis clearly show that the polymerization at low potentials is dominated by a one-step dimerization reaction, producing a film material consisting of short chains.
Further test results and analysis clearly show that the early falling-off of fire insulation and fracturing of longitudinal CFRG system is the main cause for lower fire resistance in CFRG strengthened beams.
The coseismic displacements obtained by GPS data analysis clearly show the spatial pattern specific to intraslab earthquakes, not only in the horizontal components but also the vertical ones.
Overall, the results of the data analysis clearly show that the use of a pretreatment process for the substrate feed of biogas plants is beneficial to process efficiency.
The analysis clearly showed that the whole fossil record does not look anything like the periods after hominins appear.
The comparative analysis clearly shows that GDI based circuits are better compared to CMOS logic implementations.
Moreover, contact angle analysis clearly showed that the plasma polymerized samples were hydrophilic in nature.
Our analysis clearly shows that this story not only engaged a global audience, but that it changed the way social media users talked about the issue of immigration".
Rational cost-benefit analysis clearly shows it is not in Australia's benefit to treat asylum seekers like animals.
