Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
The qualitative analysis browser – Qual Browser was adopted to analyze the chromatograms obtained by GC/MS method.
Similar(59)
For junction analysis, a Browser Extensible Data (BED) file that contains putative splice junctions is needed.
Following that post, Chitika ran some analysis on browsers and operating systems, and it found that users of Microsoft's Internet Explorer are about 40percentt more likely to click on an ad than Firefox users, about 50percentt more likely than Apple Safari users, and 80percentt more likely than Google Chrome users.
Should the user desire further analysis using browser-based bioinformatics tools (such as Expasy, BLAST, ClustalW), the 'user-defined cut and paste' function would come in handy, overcoming the highly difficult task of highlighting sequences in a touch-screen interface.
The first one deals with the classes, the number of bugs, and the Granger results of the system under analysis (called Granger browser) while the second one deals with the complexity of the bugs (called Bug as Entity browser).
Quantitative analysis using Qual Browser (version2.2; Thermo Fisher Scientific) was performed as described previously [ 22].
For ECR browser analysis, genome assemblies hg18 (human), mm8 (mouse) and rn4 (rat) were used (ECR browser, February 2007).
ECR browser analysis (ECR browser, Feb. 2007) revealed that rs35753505 (SNP8NRG221533) is listed among human SNPs which are located in ECRs (greater than or equal to 70% identity over at least 100 bp, human mouse comparison).
25 After immunostaining, slides were analysed with an image analysis workstation (Spot Browser version 7; Alphelys, Plaisie, France), as described previously.
With WebMGA, users can use many individual tools and assemble the tools into a pipeline for more complicated analysis through web browsers or client-side scripts.
After staining, slides were analysed with an image-analysis workstation (Spot Browser version 7; Alphelys), as previously described (Pages et al, 2005).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com