The phrase "analysis based on trial" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing a method of analysis that relies on experimental or trial data to draw conclusions.
Example: "The analysis based on trial results indicated a significant improvement in performance metrics."
Alternatives: "trial-based analysis" or "analysis derived from trials".
Proposed sensitivity analysis based on trial quality was not conducted because of the small number of trials identified.
Second, choosing the method for the primary analysis based on trial data has been shown to lead to unreliable results in several settings [ 1- 4].
The results were largely similar in a sensitivity analysis based on trial quality and when the EUROMAX data was considered as a comparison trial of unfractionated heparin plus GpIIb/IIIa inhibitor (data not shown).
Subgroup analysis based on trial quality (low risk of bias versus high risk of bias) and cohort enrolled (hypertension versus non-hypertension trials) did not make any noticeable difference for the above analyses (table 3).
An experimental analysis based on clinical trial data from 200 volunteers has been conducted to illustrate the effectiveness of this method.
As suggested above, a potential limitation of this study was the post hoc nature of the psychometric analysis based on clinical trial data.
Two forms of economic evaluation will be undertaken for this project: (1) an incremental cost-effectiveness analysis based on primary trial data; (2) a net benefit analysis based on modelling a broader roll-out of this programme using data arising from this trial.
To further investigate interactions between memory-related and reward/punishment-related regions in each condition of Reward, Punishment, and Control during IWS, we employed a 3-step correlation analysis based on individual trial activations (Rissman et al. 2004; Daselaar et al. 2006; Ritchey et al. 2008; St Jacques et al. 2009).
The classic analysis based on seven trials providing binary data on this end point 25 27 28 30 32 33 gave an odds ratio of 1.04 (95% confidence interval 0.78 to 1.38); P=0.779 (I=0%; P=0.856).
The classic analysis based on eight trials providing binary data on this end point 25 27 28 30 32 33 gave an odds ratio of 0.78 (95% confidence interval 0.56 to 1.09); P=0.151 (I=12.3%; P=0.337).
Analysis based on randomised trials of mammography screening found that survival with interval cancers was similar, 7 27 better, 20 or poorer 24 than survival with non-screen detected cancers.
