The phrase "analysis acknowledged that a" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where a study or examination recognizes or accepts a particular point or finding.
Example: "The analysis acknowledged that a significant correlation exists between the two variables."
Alternatives: "the study recognized that a" or "the research accepted that a".
The authors of the 2011 EOI analysis acknowledged that "Amongst the limitations is the limited information on how the recurrences were treated.
The Committee for a Responsible Federal Government, one of Washington's most reliable deficit scolds, on Tuesday issued an analysis acknowledging that the ACA has helped to bring down projections of federal healthcare spending from 2011 to 2021 by $900 billion.
In light of Moore's Open Question Argument, those who advocate an epistemology of conceptual analysis acknowledge that the correct analysis, whatever it is, is likely not at all obvious.
Indeed, a footnote in Friedman's analysis acknowledges that his figures assume that twenty per cent of people's projected out-of-pocket costs would be for things found to be "not medically necessary".
Operational Target Analysis acknowledges that Iranian spies are among the most disciplined and ideologically committed in the world, making their organisation difficult to infiltrate and agents hard to turn.
The analysis acknowledges that while using transitional protection – applying the tax credit cuts only to new claimants – would reduce the number of losing families substantially, it would drastically slow the pace of savings to the exchequer.
Electron microscopy and laser particle analysis acknowledge that yttria addition aids powder agglomeration during ball milling.
The Times investigation, which appears to rely largely on the Kosovar security establishment for information and analysis, acknowledges that its account of which ideological forces from the East infiltrated the country and how is "obscure" and "labyrinthine".
But most researchers trained in climate analysis, while acknowledging that weather data in parts of the world are not as good as they would like, offer evidence to show that weather extremes are getting worse.
Ferroni and Hopkirk adopt 'extended' boundaries for their analysis of PV without acknowledging that such choice of boundaries makes their results incompatible with those for all other technologies that have been analysed using more conventional boundaries, including nuclear energy with which the authors engage in multiple inconsistent comparisons.
