The phrase "analysis achieved" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that a particular analysis has been successfully completed or accomplished.
Example: "After several weeks of research and data collection, we can confidently say that our analysis achieved the desired results."
Alternatives: "analysis completed" or "analysis finalized".
The critical analysis achieved by use of dialogue commentary is shown in Table 2.
Sensory analysis, achieved through a descriptive profiling test, was conducted with eight trained assessors using 19 sensory attributes for 48 different bread types in two replicates.
Confirmatory factor analysis achieved good (reward, neglect, override, magnify) to acceptable (punish) levels of fit, and scales had good levels of internal consistency, except for punish (all emotions) and neglect (overjoy).
In addition to examining the biosignals of patients, using the physical activity results and stress levels deduced from the emotional state analysis achieved a higher performance in risk estimation.
With five outcome categories (scores) we obtained a classification sensitivity of 49%, which is approximately as well as physician experts and discriminant analysis achieved using a subset of the same data.
Moreover, the energetic analysis achieved is integrated with a heat transfer model and coupled to a thermodynamic model to evaluate the cooling capacity and the coefficient of performance of the refrigeration system, based on geometrical and operational parameters such as heat input, diameter ratio and bubble tube length as well as the ammonia fraction at the inlet of the bubble pump.
The NIFA analysis achieves a much higher level of precision, appropriate for more advanced stability investigations.
Expressed as RMS differences, the phase delay analysis achieves values of 3.5 cm (GPS) and 3.3 cm (GLONASS), whereas the SNR analysis achieves higher values of 4.0 cm (GPS) and 4.7 cm (GLONASS).
The SNR analysis achieves an RMS difference of 4.0 to 4.7 cm for frequency L1, whereas the RMS difference is around 9.0 cm for frequency L2.
Evidence indicates that MLE and Bayesian analysis achieve similar statistical inference, while the Bayesian analysis provides a narrower confidence interval around estimated WTP.
In particular, we examine three heuristic commitment techniques and show that the two techniques based on dynamic problem structure analysis achieve superior performance across all experiments.
