The phrase "analyses were affected by" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing how certain factors or variables have influenced the results or outcomes of analyses.
Example: "The analyses were affected by the unexpected changes in the data set, leading to different conclusions than initially anticipated."
Alternatives: "analyses were influenced by" or "analyses were impacted by".
However, these subgroup analyses were affected by large random variation, so we could not distinguish between different models.
Nonetheless, there was an implication that some areas in the uncorrected whole-brain analyses were affected by both environmental and genetic risk factors for obsessive compulsive disorder.
Although our sample size was large relative to previous studies, the histological subtype analyses were affected by small numbers as evidenced by large CIs.
Both ANOVA and DR analyses are affected by the experimental error, response profile, number of observations and experimental design.
The interpretation of our analyses is affected by modest and uneven sampling and we cannot with confidence distinguish between inadequate lineage sorting and true species delimitations.
Furthermore, specificity analyses are affected by the nature of assay systems like in vitro assays with recombinant protein or ex vivo measurements in cell lines naturally expressing the enzyme.
Next, we considered whether the relationships found by correlation and linear regression analyses are affected by lung cancer, the most globally lethal cancer, and pancreatic, esophagus, and liver cancers, the most locally lethal cancers (see Table 2 and the Materials and Methods section).
Generalizability of longitudinal analyses was affected by these non-response-associated selectivity effects.
The systematic examination of potential sources of bias within the individual studies, the risk of misclassified phenotypes, and the assessment of inconsistencies between studies that used heterogeneity tests and sensitivity analyses indicate that all meta-analyses are affected by confounders that tend to weaken the strength or presence of the associations.
Finally, the analyses of the determinants were affected by the modest sample size and difficulties inherent to the assessment of these determinants.
We analysed how these species were affected by the four scenarios by considering changes in their habitats.
