Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
The phrase "analyses showed no differences" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where research findings or data analysis results indicate that there are no significant variations or changes observed in the subject being studied.
Example: "In our study of the two treatment methods, analyses showed no differences in patient recovery times."
Alternatives: "analyses revealed no differences" or "analyses indicated no differences."
Exact(23)
As separate post-hoc analyses showed no differences in the main results between two groups with different baseline levels of work ability, the conclusions remain unchanged.
Analyses showed no differences in pointing angular-error or egress time among the groups.
Further analyses showed no differences in outcome variables between recipients of KNW versus controls when the donor age was > or =60 years.
Sensitivity analyses showed no differences in the results.
Histopathological, biochemical, and hematological analyses showed no differences between the treated mice and the control mice (Figures 2, 3, and 4).
Table 1 Means (standard deviation) for the bond strength (MPa) Groups Bond strength (MPa) Universal-moist 8.9 (1.5)A Universal-dry 7.1 (1.7)A Control 9.9 (2.8)A Statistical analyses showed no differences among groups.
Similar(37)
Morphometric and stereological analyses showed no difference in blood vessel density or VEGF expression in PTGER4 tumours compared with WT tumours indicating that PTGER4-mediated tumour growth was not a result of increased angiogenesis.
Additional analyses showed no difference between types of bisphosphonate for risk of oesophageal and colorectal cancers.
Analyses showed no difference in the distributions among survival categories relative to MCPyV status (Table 5).
Unadjusted analyses showed no difference in significant results; findings were the same without covariates.
The sensitivity analyses showed no difference when using the smallest detectable change (4.1 points) as a cut-off value.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com