Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(7)
Within the PD patient group, analyses revealed a significant difference between the pre- and postoperative conditions for the Emotion score of the Eyes test (z = −2.14, p = .03).03
Post-hoc analyses revealed a significant difference between sensitizers and repressors (p = .01) and between sensitizers and fluctuating subjects (p<.05).
Post-hoc analyses revealed a significant difference between tg-vehicle and either control-vehicle or tg-doxy group in total distance traveled (p<0.05, respectively) and non-movement time (p<0.05, p<0.01).
Post-hoc analyses revealed a significant difference between multipartite primary chromosome and secondary chromosomes (p = 0.009, Mann Whitney test) as well as a significant difference between multipartite primary chromosome and multipartite plasmids (p = 0.014).
Stratified analyses revealed a significant difference between the peri-urban and rural community (2.8% vs. 7.9%, p = 0.032, Chi2 test), but not between women and men (3.4% vs. 7.3%, p = 0.094, Chi2 test).
Univariate analyses revealed a significant difference between tumour and benign hyperplastic tissue for immunohistochemical staining results of FASN (P<0.001), MYC (P<0.001), and PP1 α (P=0.020), indicating a role of these proteins in tumour initiation (Table 3).
Similar(53)
Finally, contrast analyses at baseline revealed a significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.01 for both sub-scores).
This revealed a significant difference between the correlations in each hemisphere (t=1.79, P<0.05, one-tailed).
Our extensive analyses fail to reveal a significant difference between the WT and mutant cells (Data not shown).
The nMDS and MRPP analyses did not reveal a significant difference between the diabetic and non-diabetic wound microbiota on the community level (data not shown).
Statistical analyses revealed a significant correlation between GABA accumulation and a higher survival ability of the corresponding identifiable descending neurons37.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com