Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(3)
However, as interim analyses revealed a lower than 0.59 correlation in our study sample.
The FTIR analyses revealed a lower relative proportion of CO groups in OM ER) compared to OM PY) indicating differences in the degree of microbial processing between these fractions.
Secondary analyses revealed a lower risk of death (adjusted hazard ratio 0.86, 0.75 to 0.98) and heart failure (0.77, 0.69 to 0.87) with pioglitazone but no significant difference in the risk of acute myocardial infarction (0.95, 0.81 to 1.11).
Similar(57)
Sensitivity analyses revealed a significantly lower RR in larger (≥500 cases) compared to smaller studies but no significant difference comparing published to unpublished evidence.
Our analyses revealed a significantly lower LNY in patients undergoing NC in comparison to patients who did not.
Formal survival analyses revealed a significantly lower rate in the contact group (p =.04) for the first two years; differences in the rates gradually diminished, and by year 14 no differences between groups were observed (25/389 vs 26/454) [ 11].
Still, volumetric analyses revealed a trend toward lower regional volumes in patients (P = 0.07), which is consistent with thalamic atrophy reported in larger and more heterogeneous patient groups.
Longitudinal analyses revealed a significant trend of lower PRL concentrations with increasing number of MetS components in women (p = 0.033), but not in men (p = 0.331).
Multivariable analyses revealed a significant linear relationship between increased fitness and lower mortality risk, even while adjusting for total sedentary time and covariates (p=0.02).
Linear regression analyses revealed an association between lower cord area and greater task-related BOLD signal during right handgrip in the leg area of primary motor cortex (P = 0.005, corrected for multiple comparisons within region of interest) (Fig. 6A, Table 3).
Logistic regression analyses revealed a significant moderating effect of exercise.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com