The phrase "analyses prefer" is not correct in standard written English.
It seems to be a fragment and lacks clarity without additional context.
Example: "In this study, analyses prefer to focus on quantitative data rather than qualitative insights."
Alternatives: "analyses favor" or "analyses tend to".
Some ichthyologists are hesitant to accept taxonomic suggestions based on molecular phylogenetic analyses, preferring morphological evidence for all proposals regarding classification [ 87].
However, prevalent statistical software for epidemiological analyses prefers datasets prepared in wide table format with each individual record corresponding to one row.
Where separate estimates were available for chewing tobacco and for snuff, results for chewing tobacco were used in the main meta-analyses, though alternative analyses preferring estimates for snuff were also carried out.
The same is true for the specific current smoking analyses and the analyses preferring current smoking in Table 9. Results for ever or current smoking by level of selected characteristics are therefore only presented in the Additional files.
As so many of the RRs are common between the specific ever smoking analyses in Table 5 and the analyses preferring ever smoking in Table 9 the pattern of RRs by level of the characteristics studied tends to be quite similar.
He refused to be analysed, preferring, as he put it, "to remain in the darkness".
We therefore analyse preferred and perceived residence, focusing on the urban-rural dimension and related urban-rural residential preference to landscape features, amenities, and the availability of public services in the immediate living environment, controlling for socio-economic, lifestyle, and life stage characteristics.
Although the Kalligrammatinae and Kallihemerobiinae are not grouped as a clade in the Bayesian analyses, we prefer the sister relationship of the Kalligrammatinae and Kallihemerobiinae that was firmly supported by the character of a deep MA bifurcation in the parsimony results.
Although it is generally true that those performing either risk assessments or meta-analyses would prefer more detailed information regarding key data and assumptions, the study author's choice of how to present this information can greatly influence its interpretability to different audiences.
Findings from our main analyses are preferred to those from the sensitivity analyses because they pertain to a larger number of Norwegian patients with AMI and are more precise (eg, the ORs/estimated effects of MHS in the bivariate models in table 3 have narrower CIs than similar estimates in table 4).
