The phrase "analyses of the tree" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the examination or study of a tree, whether in a scientific, literary, or metaphorical context.
Example: "The analyses of the tree revealed important insights into its growth patterns and health."
Alternatives: "examinations of the tree" or "studies of the tree".
We performed series of statistical analyses of the tree species distribution and diversity in relation to environmental and anthropogenic factors.
To answer these scientific questions we performed series of statistical analyses of the tree species distribution and diversity along the latitudinal gradient in Northwestern Russia based on the tree data collected within the ICP Forests monitoring programme.
These expression data together with information of cis-motif analyses, GO annotations and sequence similarities inferred from comparative analyses of the tree crops can facilitate the systematic functional predictions of identified TFs.
Analyses of the tree data used raw abundance measures (based on full plot stem counts), while analyses of the understorey data used presence-absence observations (based on subplot presences, with each recorded species given a value of 1 24 for each plot).
For the TC dataset, we focused our analyses of the tree-progression models on trying to identify predictors of survival.
Statistical analyses of the trees were performed by employing the bootstrap test (1000 replicates) for multiple alignments.
We also discuss the utility of this approach for forensic analysis as well as for phylogeographic analyses of the olive tree complex.
Our analyses provide a point of departure for future taxon- and gene-rich analyses of the eukaryotic tree of life, which will be critical for resolving their phylogenetic interrelationships.
Deep phylogenetic analyses of the eukaryote tree are often plagued with long-branch attraction (LBA) artifacts, even when large multi-gene phylogenomic data sets are used [ 42, 43].
Maximum likelihood analyses of the constraint trees confirm that the likelihoods of the unconstrained trees were significantly better in all comparisons (P value < 0.001).
Analyses of the evolutionary trees of these peptides with those of reported I-superfamily conotoxins showed that nine of them fall in I2 superfamily clades, but two of them were neither I1- and I2- nor I3-superfamily clades.
